
Is your driver causing the slice—or is it your delivery?
A drive can start near the target and bend sharply right. Another can launch left and then peel right. For a right-handed player, both can finish in trouble, yet they do not automatically reveal the same fault. A better starting point is to record four separate clues: launch direction, curvature, impact location and consistency.
On October 20, 2026, former teaching professional Brittany Olizarowicz examined the equipment-versus-swing question for MyGolfSpy in Why Do I Slice? Equipment Causes vs. Swing Causes. Her useful distinction is that club specifications may affect performance without being the sole explanation for a recurring miss. The following observation exercise is an original GOLFTWITT editorial tool, not a proven quick fix.
Start line, curve and strike are different clues
With a centered strike, the clubface direction at impact is a major influence on the ball's starting line. The difference between face angle and clubhead path, known as face-to-path, strongly influences curvature. For a right-hander, a face open relative to the path generally produces rightward bend. The TrackMan explanation makes clear that this is a relationship between two variables, not a slogan that path never matters.
But the driver introduces another issue: gear effect. A strike toward the heel can introduce additional fade-type curvature, while a toe strike can influence the ball in the other direction. Titleist explains how off-center contact changes head rotation and ball spin. That means a curving shot alone cannot tell you exactly what the face and path were doing.
Left-handed golfers should reverse left/right descriptions. Wind, different balls, tee height and day-to-day delivery can also affect the result.
Four observations worth recording
1. Starting direction. Pick a narrow reference beyond your landing area. Classify the ball's initial movement as left, on line or right; do not judge only where it finishes.
2. Curve. Record nearly straight, gentle fade or clear slice. Visual observation is approximate; do not pretend to measure precise spin or club angles without appropriate technology.
3. Face contact. Use impact tape approved for the club or another non-damaging contact marker. Group strikes as heel, center or toe. Avoid products that may damage the finish.
4. Consistency. A repeated heel pattern points to a different investigation from marks scattered over the entire face. One spectacular drive or one severe miss says little on its own.
A practical 20-drive observation sheet
Warm up normally. On a safe, level practice area, keep the driver, ball model, aim point and usual tee height consistent. Position any camera or helper well clear of the swing and ball-flight areas.
Hit four sets of five drives, with a brief pause between sets. For each, note start line, curve, strike point and finish direction. Do not rebuild your swing or change club settings halfway through: this first session is meant to establish your normal pattern, not compare several interventions simultaneously.
Review the combinations rather than relying on a single “slice percentage”:
- Centered contact, left start and right bend: face-to-path deserves a coach's attention; the club has not been established as the cause.
- Repeated heel contact and right bend: examine impact consistency, club length and setup; both fitting and technique remain possible explanations.
- Right start followed by a sharper right curve: the face may be pointing right at impact, but strike location and wind still need checking.
- Impact marks all across the face: consistent contact is a more immediate question than buying a draw-biased driver.
When instruction and fitting each make sense
If strikes are centered and repeatable but the slice persists, an instructor can evaluate face angle, path and face-to-path. A qualified fitter can investigate length, loft, settings and shaft suitability for this particular golfer. Shaft stiffness by itself is not a diagnosis; draw bias is not a promise of a draw. If strike location varies widely, focus first on developing a more repeatable contact pattern.
Evidence limits: GOLFTWITT's 20-ball sheet is an editorial self-observation method, not a clinically or experimentally validated training intervention. Twenty swings cannot prove causation or guarantee improvement. Check whether the pattern recurs across sessions and seek individualized coaching when necessary.
Sources: Brittany Olizarowicz, MyGolfSpy, October 20, 2026; TrackMan — Face to Path; Titleist — Gear Effect.
Read more on this topic
Why Does Your Driver Keep Breaking Tees? Five Causes and an 18-Ball Test
A broken tee cannot diagnose your driver swing. Check tee height, strike location, turf and delivery with a cautious 18-ball A–B–A comparison.
Where should a chip land? A 24-shot practice test for your short game
Successful chipping involves choosing a landing spot as well as a final target. We examine a 23 October MyGolfSpy practice idea and offer a measurable, safety-conscious 24-shot self-test.
Can physical training add golf distance? What 33 studies actually found
A meta-analysis of 33 studies involving 798 golfers assessed how physical training affects club speed and distance. Here is what the averages mean, what remains uncertain and how to track your own progress.
Driver Speed or Accuracy? A 24-Ball Practice Test for Three Swing Intentions
A small MyGolfSpy test found more carry but wider dispersion with faster drives. Here is a cautious 24-ball self-check for speed, accuracy and playable misses.

